Back to the websites

Example site for an entirely fictional business — not a real company.

People

Six attorneys.

Our team

Dr Annette Whitfield

Partner, specialist in employment law

Restructuring, union relations

Martin Rowe

Partner, specialist in commercial law

Drafting, succession

Sarah Lindsay

Attorney

Employment law, data protection at work

Dr Peter Nolan

Attorney, specialist in employment law

Litigation

Hannah Gorley

Attorney

Commercial law, contract review

Elliot Barnes

Attorney

Corporate law, conversions

How we see ourselves

We are not a large firm and don't intend to become one. Six lawyers are enough to cover three areas seriously, and few enough that every matter can be discussed in house.

What sets us apart is an attitude to disputes: a case won is rarely the best outcome. We put numbers on what a settlement costs and what a judgment would cost — before you decide.

Whitfield & Partners

Attorneys for employment, commercial and corporate law. Based in Madison, retained nationwide.

© 2026 Whitfield & Partners · whitfield-partners.com

Demo site — firm and content are fictional

The project frame

How Awelior would approach this project

Whitfield & Partners is invented — the way it is built is not. None of this is work delivered for a client. It is the shape we would give such a project — with the same depth, but without a client who would have to answer for it.

Where it starts

Whitfield & Partners advise on employment, commercial and corporate law; engagements come from across the country and first contact almost always follows a search for a specific problem. A managing director facing a wrongful termination claim decides in two minutes whether to call — and decides it on whether this firm has handled his kind of case before.

Decisions

  • Practice areas before people

    The route runs from the area of law to the attorney, not the other way round. Someone with a problem is not looking for a name; they are looking for the right desk. So the team gets its own page, clearly visible but not as the entry point.

  • A quiet archetype, centred layout

    Centred headings, generous white space, no blocks of color. That is not taste but competence: the same structure dressed as a trade business would immediately contradict every claim about care and precision.

  • Initial consultation as a booking flow

    The contact page carries a four-step booking route — service, day, time, summary — instead of a phone number alone. Somebody landing here at ten at night with a dismissal letter in hand should be able to do something.

Deliberately left outNo success rates, no amounts in dispute, no named client logos. Professionally risky and substantively worthless — the logo strip therefore shows sectors rather than firms, and the key figures name fields of work rather than outcomes.

What is in it

Pages
5
Content blocks
20
Languages
4

Five pages, in all four languages. Navigation, the expandable questions and the full booking flow including its summary all respond — and the summary says outright that nothing was booked. Indicated only: directions and the sending of the contact form.

How it would go on

  • Appointments into the firm's calendar

    A connection to the calendar system with real consultation lengths, buffers and blocked periods — and a rule about which requests may be confirmed without a callback.

  • Client data and confidentiality

    A contact form at a law firm is a special case: what people write into it may already relate to a matter. That touches transport, mailbox, retention and the question of who inside the firm reads along.

  • News that is actually kept up

    The article list lives on new judgments. Without somebody writing monthly it becomes, within six months, the opposite of a trust signal.

Talk through your project